Skip to main content

BallWorld Screen Saver

Overview:

My last Java programming assignment for my class at the University of Akron was called "BallWorld."  Its details can be found here.  I will not post any source code here, but I will post an executative JAR file that will run the screen saver.  Anyways, the final project of the BallWorld project was kind of cool, so I modified it a little bit to make a pretty neato screen saver.  You can download the project here: BallWorld.zip.  The zip file contains a .JAR, an .EXE, and a .JOB.  The JAR file should execute the screen saver on any operating system.  The EXE file works only on Windows.  The JOB (Windows Task Scheduler) file can be used to automatically run the EXE file after a specified amount of computer idle time.

Details:

The EXE file was created using a program called Launch4j.  Launch4j simply takes a JAR file and converts it into a Win32 EXE.  Obviously, this destroys platform-independency, but... it does have some advantages.  For example, if a Windows user does not have the Java Virtual Machine installed (JRE), then the JAR program will not run.  On the other hand, the EXE file determines whether or not Java is installed.  If it is not installed, it will send the user to Java's download website.  If it is installed, then the JAR file is loaded into memory and the Java Virtual Machine runs it.

Download:

Again, you can download the project here: BallWorld.zip.
Please contact me with any questions or comments.  Thanks and enjoy!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wedding Prediction - October, 2013

Carla and I are planning on getting married sometime in October next year.  We need to pick a date, and that decision may  involve some science and mathematics.  :) For example, we want the weather to be nice.  To be more precise, we'd like the high temperature for the wedding day to be between 60 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit.  Obviously, we have both lived in Ohio our entire lives, and we have a pretty good idea of what the weather will be like.  We both hypothesised that October was a "hit or miss" sort of month; it could be cold, or it could be nice. But, for me, a simple hypothesis was not enough; I really wanted to know the probabilities of decent weather based on historical weather data.  Many websites on the Internet (i.e. almanac.com) charge you to review historical weather data, but Carla and I discovered a cool page on cleveland.com that provided exactly what we wanted.  I loaded the historical temperature data from 1903 to 2011 f...
2 comments
Read more

Web Browsers You Should Support

As a web developer, generally speaking, you should consider supporting the following browsers (at the time of this writing): Chrome (latest) - the browser that sets the bar for the others; you should be using it and supporting it Internet Explorer 9+ - the browser that finally caught up with the times a bit; basically, a Chrome wannabe.  I still say that IE sucks... even if it really doesn't anymore.  Yes... I'm sour about IE8 and below. Internet Explorer 8 - the old, sad browser that we sadly still have to support for a while.  CSS 3 is not well-supported here, so we use projects like CSS3 PIE or whatever.  By the way... IE8 sucks.  I can't wait until this comes off of the list. Firefox (latest) - the browser that was once awesome and has sadly suffered recently because it's slower than Chrome... but hey, lots of people still use it. Safari (latest) - Watch out for Safari as more iPhones, iPads, Macs, and more overly-priced Apple products flood the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Developing a lightweight WebSocket library

Late in 2016, I began development on a lightweight, isomorphic WebSocket library for Node.js called ws-wrapper .  Today, this library is stable and has been successfully used in many production apps. Why?  What about socket.io ?  In my opinion, socket.io and its dependencies are way too heavy .  Now that the year is 2018, this couldn't be more true.  Modern browsers have native WebSocket support meaning that all of the transports built into the socket.io project are just dead weight.  On the other hand, ws-wrapper and its dependencies weigh about 3 KB when minified and gzipped.  Similarly, ws-wrapper consists of about 500 lines of code; whereas, socket.io consists of thousands of lines of code.  As Dijkstra once famously said: "Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability." ws-wrapper also provides a few more features out of the box.  The API exposes a two-way, Promise-based request/response interface.  That is, clients can request dat...
Post a Comment
Read more